{"id":337,"date":"2010-04-27T00:39:23","date_gmt":"2010-04-27T05:39:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thinkstick.net\/?p=337"},"modified":"2010-04-27T12:56:28","modified_gmt":"2010-04-27T17:56:28","slug":"horizontal-attention-heat-map","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/thinkstick.dreamhosters.com\/2010\/04\/horizontal-attention-heat-map\/","title":{"rendered":"Horizontal Attention Heat Map"},"content":{"rendered":"
Nielsen’s group recently published the results from an eye tracking study for user attention for horizontal dimension.<\/a><\/p>\n Their main observation is<\/p>\n Brendan Reagan from Grokdotcom came up with his own way to apply that data for testing the page layouts<\/a>.<\/p>\n Nielsen’s data for viewing time across horizontal dimension by 100 px each is found in the chart below. I translated this data into a reusable heat map to be shared with UX team at work and I figured I should share it here as well. You can get the full sized png template here<\/a>.<\/p>\n When I came across ABtests.com<\/a>, I looked through the samples uploaded and found this sign up page A\/B testing<\/a> by LessAccounting. Original test write up<\/a> theorized that having the buttons on the left might be the primary contributing factor to 20% increase in conversion rate. His hypothesis is correct if we can believe Nielsen’s data as correct across all sites with left to right reading languages.<\/p>\n Comparing the sums of attention percentage for each layout, we can clearly see the left layout got much more attention. This test is particularly a good A\/B test to support Nielsen’s data since all other elements (content, call to action button color, size) remain exactly the same in both layouts. The only difference here is the position of the call to action buttons and more informational bulleted text.<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n
\n
\n \n <\/a>\n<\/td>\n
\n \n
\n \n <\/a>\n<\/td>\n
\n \n
\n